Friday, 15 July 2016

Recently I've been watching.... more TV recommendations (and Charles Dance)


The next in my occasional series of drama series recommendations for Netflix etc addicts like myself!  Some are BBC/ITV, though, which I presume are still available; links provided.  Links to other posts at the end.


I've recently watched and loved Versailles, which is about the court of Louis XIV.  It's a lavish production with some terrific acting; Louis is played most compellingly by George Blagden (Athelstan in Vikings) (I was going to make the odd lecherous comment about him, but I looked him up on Wikipedia and discovered he's 30 years younger than me, so decided that to do so would seem a little gross) There's plenty of intrigue, with loads of fab costumes, and it portrays so well the corruption, infidelities and scheming of life at Court, and how little nobility cared about what really went on in their country (no change there, then).  Loved it, I really hope there's another series!  Highly recommended.

*****Five Stars*****




I very much enjoyed The Living and The Dead which is a supernatural orientated suspense type thriller set in Somerset in late Victorian times, in which a forward thinking psychologist and his London wife return to the estate owned by his family, when he becomes the new Lord of the Manor.  Lots of dark atmosphere and the pagan style superstitions of the simple rural folk.  For a change, the ghosts come from the future as well as the past, which I loved ~ the main character, Nathan Appleby, sees a woman with a 'book of light', which turns out to be an iPad!  Stars Colin Morgan as Nathan, and Charlotte Spencer ~ I saw her in some teen series, recently, the name of which escapes me, and she's great. 

****Four stars**** 




Just finished watching the 2005 dramatisation of Bleak House
~ stars Gillian Anderson and Charles Dance (see below), Denis Lawson, Timothy West and Hugo Speer, amongst others.  I enjoyed it, and liked the way it brought out the pantomime quality of the characters as in the actual Dickens books.  Very theatrical; my only problem was the casting of Anna Maxwell Martin as main character Esther Summerson, who was (I thought) both irritating and plain; I thought it unlikely that three men would have sought her hand in marriage.  Good, though, most atmospheric in parts, and worth watching.

***Three and a half stars***



Straight after Bleak House I watched a four part drama about The Great Fire of London in 1666.  As soon as I saw it I leapt on it, thinking it would be great, especially with such a cast ~ the girl who played Ygritte in Game of Thrones, the bloke who played Richard Harrow in Boardwalk Empire ~ and Charles Dance, doing his usual: the haughty, underhand posh bloke with the heart of steel.  Alas, it was dreadful, particularly the last episode which was so bad it was like a spoof.  Done on the cheap, I suspected (we saw very little of the actual fire), a waste of some fine actors, and the dialogue was abysmal.  

**Two Stars** (only because I liked the historical aspect)




....and talking of Charles Dance, I wonder if, when he left acting school, his tutors said to him, "Don't worry, lad, you'll only ever have to play one part, with a face like yours."  Indeed, all his roles seem to be interchangeable, don't they?  I wonder if he ever gets fed up with playing said haughty, underhand posh blokes with hearts of steel?

Charles Dance as Mr Tulkinghorn in Game of Thrones

Charles Dance as Tywin Lannister in The Great Fire

Charles Dance as Lord Denton in Bleak House

Just one last one, not a drama series but some tales of real life con-artists!  Includes interviews with the victims too.  It's terrible, and fascinating ~ I recommend American Greed!

****Four Stars****




More TV recommendations and comments:

The Americans, Alone, The Whispers, New Blood

Vikings, UnREAL, Fear The Walking Dead, Between, Roots

Bloodline, The Path, The Secret, Secrets & Lies, Banshee, Containment

Billions, Outsiders, Better Call Saul,

Thursday, 14 July 2016

#TwitterTips posts (and more) on @rosieamber1's Wednesday Wing

Aside from the book reviews, Rosie Amber's readers and writers blog has many and varied features, one of the most popular of which is her Wednesday Wing, which gives advice on blogging, social media, self-publishing and more.  I've contributed a few articles on this, and thought I'd provide the links here in case anyone has missed and would like to read them.

Note: 2019
The odd bit of practical advice may be out of date now, as the site changes all the time, but the basic principles remain.

Twitter Tips











and for writers and reviewers....





Sunday, 3 July 2016

Dealing With Bad Reviews


As part of an author interview, I recently gave my thoughts on dealing with bad reviews.  A few people said they were helpful, so I thought I'd turn it into a blog post, and add to it a bit (including some amusing examples!).  Here you go, then, and I hope at least one or two of these bits of advice are of use :)


Try to accept them as inevitable, and part of the whole writing/publishing process; in other words, don't be shocked by them!  I know they knock your confidence, it's never nice to get them and we all go through it, but, alas, not everyone will love everything you do.  The more widely read a book becomes, the more likely it is to reach the eyes of those who won't like it.
 
Look up your all-time favourite books on Amazon.  They will have some 1 and 2*, too.  If Phillipa Gregory/Elizabeth Jane Howard/William Boyd, etc, can get bad reviews, so can you.



Don't consider 3* a bad review ~ 3* means 'it's okay' on Amazon and 'I like it' on Goodreads.

Don't challenge them; if you've made your book available on a site that allows readers to review, they have a right to express their opinion.  Yes, it's SO tempting, particularly if they've said something factual that isn't right; I had a 2* on Goodreads the other day, and when I went to comment on it (just to point the error out, honestly!) I got this pop-up that said 'are you sure you want to post this comment'?  I was really glad about that - I didn't write anything!
  

Learn from them; if more than one reader says the book has, for instance, unrealistic dialogue, they might be expressing the opinion of many; the majority of readers don't review, but will simply not buy another book from you.


Helpful though it is, reviewers are not obliged to give constructive feedback.  The time for a manuscript critique is before publication.  If a reviewer just wants to write 'Really boring', they have a right to do so.  We don't complain about two word reviews when they just say 'Loved it!', after all... 😉
 
A few mediocre reviews makes the book look more credible, as if it's been more widely read.  Few things look more naff than just eight reviews, all 5*, written by people who've never reviewed anything else.  


As far as visibility on Amazon goes, it's the number of reviews rather than the rating average that makes a difference, I believe.  So it's all good!
 
Don't complain to or about book bloggers who do not review your book favourably.  If their terms state that they do not guarantee a good review, they mean it!  Always read the terms first.  I wrote a post about 'book blogger bashing' HERE



 

Understand the difference between a bad review from a genuine reader who wasn't that keen on your book, and a troll who is out to get you personally. Shouting 'troll' every time you get a bad review can make you look a bit petulant.

Yes, your 1* review might be from someone you blocked on Twitter (it's happened to me), but, more often than not, looking at the reader's reviewing history will simply show you that your writing style is not one that the reviewer likes.  For instance, I have rarely had a very good review from romance or crime thriller readers.
 

Read, learn from it if possible ~ then walk away.... 



Monday, 27 June 2016

Recently I've been watching... THE AMERICANS and more

My occasional telly round-up :)  Click the series name for more info.

I so looked forward to this, and it lived up to my expectations: series 4 of
The Americans.  It's set in the 1980s, and stars Keri Russell and Matthew Rhys as two Russian spies who live in the northern Virginia suburbs of Washington DC, posing as a normal American couple with two children.  One of their close neighbours is an FBI agent...

I watched the whole series over a period of 2 evenings, but you need to start at the beginning.  It's quite low key for series these days, a proper old fashioned spy drama/thriller without a ridiculous amount of car chases, etc; it's just brilliant scripted and acted.  Keri Russell as Elizabeth is fab, another fictional woman I want to be (after Lagertha in Vikings and Michonne in The Walking Dead).  Highly recommended!

*****Five Stars***** 



I just watched the first series of Alone, which is a reality show in which ten men are dropped onto Vancouver Island in British Columbia to survive alone, in winter, amongst cougars, bears and wolves, for 90 days.  I loved this, as I'm fascinated by survival in adverse circumstances.  It's good because there's no annoying presenter; it's all filmed by the contestants themselves.  They have an emergency phone to ring if they want to 'tap out' (ie, if they've had enough).  One wimped out in 12 hours, another on the 2nd day (okay, they did have bears and wolves outside their tents...), but four of them kept going for nearly two months.  One guy made a yurt and a canoe - the difference in their capabilities was amazing.  Definitely watching the next series.  Only downside was that you don't find out what happened afterwards; it would have been nice hearing what the four who really made a go of it thought of it all, and how it affected them when they got home.  You get to see this about the winner, but not the others.

****Four and a half stars**** 



I quite liked The Whispers, about an alien race who invade the minds of the children of important people in the government, etc, in order to manipulate their parents, because the aliens want to take over the planet.  Yes, it sounds pretty silly, but it's good.  The main problem is that so many of the cast are kind of irritating, especially the main female character, Clare, and some of the children are a bit ghastly (though others are very good, in particular Henry, a little sweetie), but I watched a whole series without being made to!

***Three and a half stars*** 



I've watched the first three episodes of New Blood, a new BBC detective show.  It's fairly entertaining and the plot of the first story was good, but it's a bit too self consciously 'twenty-somethings in 21st century London' for me.  A tad lighter than I like, too.  Familiar faces are Mark Addy (Robert Baratheon in GoT) playing the sterotypical old school detective who resents the 'new blood' and wants everything done his way, but then looks an idiot when aforementioned New Blood solves the case, and Anna Chancellor (Duckface in Four Weddings and a Funeral).

***Three Stars*** 



More coming soon.... 

Friday, 24 June 2016

DOs and DON'Ts for First Time Novelists

Recently, I clicked on a post on Twitter entitled '21 tips for new writers'.  It was on a writing blog, not a marketing one, but I was appalled to see that the first 15 tips were about establishing your social media presence, your author 'brand', choosing a great cover and blogging about your book as you write it, to create interest for when it's published.  Only at the end were a few sentences about making sure you can actually write in the first place, as though the blogger had remembered to say a few words about the content of the book itself, as an afterthought.

Here's my advice.
I don't mention your author 'brand' once.  
Because it's about writing the novel.  



Dos and don’ts for first time novelists

Twenty-four years ago I thought 'I wonder if I could write a novel?'  This article is for those who’ve recently had the same thought - random pieces of advice for those who are putting finger to laptop key for the first time, taken from my own experience and observation of others’.  I hope it helps!

  • DO read a lot, and when you do so, take notice of why certain passages appeal to you, or bore you.  Be aware of the structure of the story as a whole, and what it is that makes you keep turning the pages…
  • …but DON’T try to write like your favourite authors.  Those whose work you love reading are successful because they have their own ‘voice’, and you need to find yours, too.  In the future, when your novel is published, some readers might say that your style reminds them of so-and-so’s, but this should be a happy accident, not something you seek to achieve.
  • DO plan your novel first.  It needn’t be 50 pages of in depth character studies and scene setting; I often start a novel with just a few pages of notes about the first few chapters, but you need to know where those chapters are going.  I don’t make character studies; I carry the personalities in my head and think about them a lot (I imagine unwritten scenes, sometimes!); I think if you write a character via a list of personality traits it can become a bit 'writing by numbers'.  However, you might want to make lists of the practical details, like his date of birth, name of the company he works for, etc.  For the story arc alone, it's a good idea to have at least a basic plan, because….
  • …. everything you write should be relevant to the plot, so that you DON’T dive off at tangents and then realise that the great scene outside the pub is going nowhere.  And it helps with time continuity.  I have pages of A4 blu-tacked all over the wall in front of my desk, to which I constantly refer.
  • DO show your first attempts (the first few chapters, maybe) to someone who will give you an honest opinion – ie, not a family member or friend who may tell you only what you want to hear.  It’s really hard doing this, I know.  I felt sick with nerves when I gave my first novel to someone else to take a look at!  Of course it’s not for me or anyone else to say that someone shouldn’t do something they enjoy, but it helps to have realistic expectations if you’re hoping for any sort of success in getting published/finding a readership, and it can help you iron out your weak points; you might ramble too much, for instance, or include far too much backstory (one of my downfalls!)
  • … and DON’T be in too much of a hurry to publish on Amazon, if that is the route you want to go down.  Make sure this is the novel you want to see as YOUR DEBUT.  If you’re submitting to agents/publishers, that’s different, because they’re the only people who’ll see it and won’t remember your name for more than five seconds, but once you self-publish, this is the novel by which your writing abilities will be judged.  I knew my first three weren’t good enough, so I didn’t even send them to agents (I wrote them in the days before Amazon Kindle).  You learn with each one you write. Yes, yes, yes – I’m aware that some super-talented people become bestsellers with the very first one they write; you may well number among those, and I bow with respect if you do, but many authors you admire have a few unpublished ones hidden away, or at least a novella and a pile of bad short stories!  Okay, let’s have a cliché here – most overnight successes have been at it for years.
  • DO think about what you like to read.  You know those long, descriptive narratives you skip-read in books?  Don’t write them.  Mostly, people don’t much care what the sideboard was made of.  Ditto how much your character paid the taxi driver and how much change she was given, unless of importance to the plot.  Cut the bits that aren’t interesting.
  • DON’T look at hugely successful books you think are rubbish and think, well, if that can become a bestseller, anything can.  A book that has been slammed for its literary merit has probably struck a chord with the public by hitting on a gap in the market, or dealing with a subject that interests many people, or simply by having a very efficient publicity machine behind it.
  • DO remember that those ‘I can’t write, I’m useless’ moments pass.  We ALL have them, honestly.  If you’re reading something you’ve just written and think it’s a heap of garbage, leave it alone, go and do something completely different, or have a moan to a writing buddy about it.  You might find that the the next time you look at it, it seems better – or that you can find a way to improve it. 
  • Talking of skip-reading, DON’T use your novel as an opportunity to show off your knowledge about something.  Yes, many of us write about what we know, and indeed use our experiences in our novels (it doesn’t half save time on research if you already know what you’re talking about!), but it should always be PLOT RELEVANT.  If you’re desperate to display to the world your in depth knowledge about the architecture of Prague, don't slip all the information into your romance novel unless it's a romance novel about two architects/artists in Prague. Ditto chunks of info taken from your research notes.
  • DO get your work professionally proofread before publishing it on Amazon or sending it to an agent or publisher.  Don’t just go with the first proofreader you come across; ask around (ask me!), look at their websites, see if they feature any testimonials from other writers.  Since self-publishing on Amazon began, loads of people are setting themselves up as proofreaders and editors, and some don’t know what they’re doing or are deliberately out to make money, not caring about the service they provide - there is no such thing as accurate proofreading software.  Let me tell you about a short story I was asked to read a while back.  The first page alone had so many errors that I suggested it was withdrawn and professionally proofread.  The poor guy told me that he loved to tell stories but was hopeless at grammar and punctuation, so had paid someone to proofread for him….. beware of the charlatans!
  • BUT……DON’T make the mistake of thinking that your editor (if you choose to use one) and/or proofreader will turn your rambling scribblings into a polished best-seller.  You need to revise and re-write until your novel is as good as it can possibly be, BEFORE it goes to the (editor and the) proofreader.  I know one of the latter who found over FIVE THOUSAND errors in one book she worked on.  Aside from these errors, it read liked a badly written first draft.  When the ‘author’ published it on Amazon, she got some very bad reviews and tried to pin the blame on the proofreader, asking for her money back.  Proofreaders are there to correct your typos, grammar and punctuations errors, not wave magic wands!
  • On that subject, maybe DON’T plunge into writing a novel if your grammar and punctuation is lousy.  If your written English is very weak, it’s best to learn how to improve it, first.  You could write blog posts or short stories, so you get used to writing.
  • DO try reading the dialogue aloud, to see if it sounds realistic.  And if you’re not sure what language a Liverpudlian teenager or a Cornish Victorian housemaid would use, find out before you write it!
  • DO leave your novel for at least a week between re-drafting.  Classic advice, but it really, really works.  I’m writing a novel of roughly 125,000 words at the moment and by the time I get to the end of one draft and go back to the beginning again, it’s been an average of a fortnight since I looked at the first few chapters, so I can see them with fresh eyes.  If you keep going over and over the same pages, despairing over them, you’ll drive yourself nuts.  You can’t see for looking!  However, if you leave it for a few weeks, you often find that the bits you thought were crap are actually fine – and you see exactly how to re-write that bit that just wasn’t working. 
  • DON’T try to be clever.  Don’t use your novel to show off your vocabulary.  Keep it simple.  Don’t use ten words where four will do.
  • DO be aware who you’re writing the novel for, at the same time as writing from the heart.  Is this story just to get all your angst out?  Okay, then it’s fine to use it as a way of exorcising your feelings towards your ex boyfriend.  Go for it.  If you’re writing it as a way of finding a readership, for this and future works, though, it’s worth reminding yourself that this catharsis should be entertaining, first and foremost.  One of the best pieces of advice I ever saw was 'write as a reader'.
  • DON’T get TOO caught up in social media.  Yes, I know you have to build your online presence, and use social networking sites to let the world know about your books, etc etc etc and blah blah blah, but while you’re joining in with a jolly four-way discussion on a Facebook writers group about how hard it is to motivate yourself/find time to write, you could actually be WRITING.  Don’t feel you HAVE to join Facebook groups and Goodreads forums, etc etc.  They’re great for networking and the exchange of ideas, but often it’s just chat (or worse, oneupmanship) and won’t get the next chapter written.    Having said that…
  • …. DO be moderately active on Twitter – it’s a wonderful site for networking, ideas, finding articles for advice on blogging, marketing, and the practical side of publishing your book.  You can also ‘meet’ so many interesting, amusing and helpful people – for this, it’s by far my favourite social networking site.  
  • One last word about Twitter – be there IN PERSON, at least some of the time.  DON’T think you can do all your future marketing via the software available, those ones that churn out tweets and retweets 24 hours a day without you having to look on the site.  Interaction is all.
  • DO make sure any practical stuff in your novel is properly researched.  Few things scream ‘amateur’ more than getting your facts wrong.
  • DON’T tell everyone you know that you’re writing a novel.  The vast majority of people don’t understand the publishing industry (and why would they?), and their first question after ‘what’s it about?’ will be ‘are you getting it published?’.  If it’s not an immediate best seller, many will presume it’s no good. 


Good luck!


Sunday, 12 June 2016

Big huge thank you!

I'd just like to say a big huge thank you to everyone who voted for me in the Bloggers Bash Awards!  And to Sacha Black and her gang for all their hard work in organising it.

I was delighted to see that I came second in the 'Best Pal' award: 

"Which blogger do you want to go to the pub with? Or maybe have dinner with? Who never fails to reply to comments, and has thoughtful things to say. Maybe they encourage the community through weekly challenges or blog parties. Who wouldn’t the blogging world be the same without?"

That's a lovely one to win, I was pleased just to be among the nominees for it!



Big congratulations to Rosie Amber for getting second place in Book Review blog - I am a member of her reviewing team #RBRT), so it's great to see that we're doing something good.  Not just book reviews, Rosie does all sorts of other posts, such as info for writers and bloggers, and genre specific reading suggestions.  And a big cheer for fellow #RBRT member Shelley Wilson for winning the 'most inspirational' category :)

Thank you!



Saturday, 11 June 2016

Dealing with bad reviews, recommendations, and more...

Writer and blogger Maria Savva chose to interview me for her Goodreads blog this week.  I am posting the link on here because it contains some advice for new writers, such as recommendations for editing and proofreading, dealing with bad reviews, length of novel, etc.  Also some author suggestions!

Read the interview HERE

 

Friday, 10 June 2016

Recently I've been watching... VIKINGS! and more...

...my occasional posts with thoughts on TV series I've binge-watched via Netflix, etc

I've just seen the latest series of Vikings!  This is one programme that gets better and better and better... fabulous story and characters, brilliant actors, amayyy-zing scenery - I love it.
 
Lagertha with treacherous Rollo, and Ragnar, he of the curious facial expressions


 

The star for me has to be the wonderful Lagertha, a role model for all women, I reckon ~ I want to be her even more than I want to be Michonne from The Walking Dead.  Why Ragnar ever let her go in favour of the scheming, faithless giraffe (Princess Aslaug), I shall never understand, and it seems he wishes he hadn't, now.  Love the bits in England from a historical point of view, too.  Such a good and unexpected ending this time. Totally gripping, excellent plot, first class acting, has never disappointed me, got to be in my all time top ten TV series.

A giraffe
The scheming, faithless Princess Aslaug

*****Five big huge gold stars*****


Just made a great new fun discovery: UnREAL, about a reality TV show called Everlasting ~ one suitor, a flock of hopeful and impossibly glamorous women, and a very jaded crew.  Really opens the eye to what happens behind the scenes on reality TV shows; scarily so!  I watched the first series over a couple of nights, and the second one has just started.

****Four Stars*****

 

Now...Fear The Walking Dead. It just doesn't compare with the real Walking Dead at all, I don't think.  The plots aren't as gripping, and the only characters I like in it are Nick and Strand ~ the others are either irritating or just flat and boring.  I watched the seven episodes of series 2 last night and, although some bits were quite good, my main thoughts throughout were:
  • a) I wish either the zombies or someone with a gun would do away with Chris, Alicia, Ophelia and Travis
  • b) why doesn't Strand stick with his 'this is my boat' stance, and tell them to either act a bit appreciative or get the hell off it (with the exception of Nick)?
  • c) why does Kim Dickens always play the same character?
The sooner they give up on the west coast and get themselves over to Georgia, the better.  Rick and Daryl will soon sort the wheat from the chaff.

***Three stars***

 
It's never not a good time for a picture of Daryl Dixon


I sort of watched (by which I mean I sometimes read while it was on, and/or fell asleep) the first series of Between, a teenage thriller about a small town in which everyone over the age of 22 dies from a mysterious virus, and the town is then cordoned off... it's okay, just about, if you like teen dramas, but it doesn't have plot holes so much as plot chasms.  Just too daft, for me.  Most of the characters got on my nerves; the acting isn't that great.  Or it might just be because they're all teenagers, or thereabouts.  I prefer programmes about over 25s, generally; they tend not to think they know everything, and throw less tantrums.

 **Two stars**


People as ancient as me might remember Roots, when it was first out in possibly the late 1970s.  If you don't know about it, it's the allegedly true story of a family of slaves, taken from Africa to work in the cotton and tobacco fields of North Carolina.  I believe Alex Haley was revealed to have made the whole thing up, about twenty years ago, but it can be just watched as fiction based on historical truth, anyway.  The remake is four one and a half hour long episodes.  It's okay; episodes one and three were pretty good (and in three the acting was a lot better, mostly by the wonderful Jonathan Rhys Meyers), but two and three were unbelievably schmaltzy.  Could have been terrific, but cheesy beyond words.


***Three Stars***

Oh, go on, then, here's a picture of Jonathan Rhys Meyers...


A very James Bond style thriller....I only saw two episodes of The Catch, starring Mireille Enos, who I loved in The Killing.  In The Catch she plays Alice Vaughan, a top private investigator in LA.  I nearly turned off ten minutes into the first episode, which was a riot of split screens, loud background music and ludicrous action, but then it got better, with a terrific scam, and I thought it might be really good.  It's a little too silly, but I might watch some more.  Mireille has some fab frocks and hairdos in it, by the way.  The scam-artist-she-loves is revoltingly smarmy.  Can't see what she sees in him at all.  

**Two and a half Stars** 



My June 3rd TV reviews/recommendations HERE, and April 14 HERE